Is my distance/size math for macro photography correct?

by Sebastian Hietsch   Last Updated June 18, 2017 14:18 PM

I was comparing Panasonic lenses the other day, and I wanted to know about their macro capabilities. Obviously Panasonic lists the closest focusing distance, but this doesn't tell me much about the image, since focal length is also a factor.

So I came up with this formula for calculating the size of an object, which fills the entire field of view, at a given distance (in this case the minimum focus distance).

Size = 2 ⋅ tan(FOV/2) ⋅ distance from camera

to see how I came to this formula, see the image below.

enter image description here

When plugging in the numbers from some lenses I came to these results:

Is the formula correct? Does this mean, if I take a picture with the first lens, I could have an object with a size of 0.076m fill the entire image?

Answers 1

Your geometry is a reasonable approximation for distant scenes. At close scenes, the focal point to image plane distance is significant and must be taken into account.

At 1:1, the focal point 2x the focal length from the image plane and the scene. At higher magnifications, the focal point is closer to the scene than the image plane. You can't ignore this for calculating geometries of macro and near-macro shots.

Olin Lathrop
Olin Lathrop
June 18, 2017 14:14 PM

Related Questions

How does bokeh radius change with distance?

Updated July 08, 2018 09:18 AM

How do extension tubes affect the image circle?

Updated July 23, 2018 09:18 AM

Best way to get into cheap macro?

Updated April 05, 2015 00:07 AM